
If your government was blocking a Web site, would you band together with others to make the site better (flagging offensive comments, for example) or browse anonymously?
-------------------------
Syria: Using Tor for Censorship Resistance
Internet filtering is a growing global phenomenon; according to the OpenNet Initiative, 26 out of 40 countries studied in 2006 censored the Internet in some way. While the majority of those countries dabble in filtering, Reporters Without Borders has named a number of countries as "Internet black holes." One of those countries is Syria.
Syria, which has officially been under Emergency Law since 1963, consistently ranks low on human rights and civil liberties indexes. According to Freedom House's Freedom in the World 2008 report, authorities' suppression of opposition activities is a leading factor in Syria's declining freedom rankings. Syria's Internet filtering scheme, deemed "pervasive" by the OpenNet Initiative, includes most blogging platforms, Facebook, YouTube and other video-sharing sites, and a number of Israel-related sites. In the past, Syria has also filtered Hotmail and other free e-mail sites.
Although Syrian Internet penetration remains around 10 percent, there is an active blogosphere, many of whose members actively resist the censorship imposed on them by their government. One such blogger is Anas Qtiesh, who says he abandoned his blog after Blogger was blocked in Syria. Says Qtiesh, "You could still open Blogger and post but no one in Syria can access a -.blogspot.com blog [without circumvention software]. It was really discouraging and frustrating."
Although there are less than 100,000 Facebook users in Syria, the ban on Facebook has had a significant effect on Internet users. Qtiesh explains that when Facebook was first blocked (allegedly due to spam-like negative comments on President Assad and his wife, some Syrian users attempted to flag and remove offensive comments in an effort to fight the censorship and convince authorities to unblock the site. "When that initiative failed," says Qtiesh, "Tech-savvy users realized that it was easier to go around the block than to actually make an effort to convince authorities to lift it."
Qtiesh, who accesses the Internet from cybercafes outside of work, says: "Proxy programs are now an essential part of any Internet cafe's software. Safely tucked at the owner's main computer, he will send it to a user's computer on demand." Although a number of programs are used, Qtiesh uses Tor and says that other advanced users, particularly those for which anonymity is a priority, do as well.
While Tor’s primary use is that of an anonymizer, it’s clear that for those in countries facing pervasive filtering, it is also an effective method for circumvention. Additionally, Tor’s open design and dedicated volunteer base make it a sustainable option for the long-term.
Comments
couldn't post a video reply
Hi, this is Anas.. the blogger quoted in the article.
I followed the video conversation and tried to post a reply, but seemic for some reason denied my registration and kept facing me with an error message, so much for free speech.
What really struck me while watching the video replies was one person saying that "syrians do like oppression, otherwise they would've done something about it!" of course, that's just common sense, how can you argue with such firm reasoning? I personally can't.
The same person stated their love of Israel and it's right to independence.. that doesn't give it the right to occupy the syrian Golan height since 1967, a fact somehow our commenter seemed unaware of. and I might add that Israel cutting all food supplies off gaza is an attempt to help the palestinians adopt a healty diet, denying them from all food supplies is an effort to support the palestinians natural immune systems.
Before anyone starts talking about Hamas or terrorism, claiming to fight terrorism doesn't give you the right to practice state terrorism. Also Hamas is a democratically elected movement.. it didn't seize power nor did it take the entirety of Gaza hostage like Israel is doing now. The American administration prefers it's America-friendly dictators to the democratic choice of the people. examples to that are too obvious for me to mention here.
Sorry for the long and off topic reply,
cheers,
Hi
I've tried to add comments via Seesmic, but it seems to either tell me there was a problem with my recording, or there is no sound. So, giving up on that, here's what I'd say in a seesmic comment:
1) I'm impressed at the quantity and quality of comments on this topic. I look forward to a continued discussion.
2) To the former Amnesty International person; I think the more diversity in the approach and solution to the problems of censorship, the better off we are. If your task is to stop all access to a certain topic, and everyone only has one way to do it, then that's easy to defend. If you're subjected to death by a thousand paper cuts, so to speak, that's far harder to do and meet your goals. The more people involved and with diverse creative solutions, the more likely we can be successful.
3) Finding others with thoughts like you is the problem of the ages. I believe the terms were "birds of a feather" in the seesmic comments. If you are in a closed society, whether state sponsored or not, it's a big risk to start talking about your beliefs that are different than the community norm. Finding others like yourself is fraught with peril for many people; and turning to the Internet is a possibility, provided it's not heavily filtered. One way this has been attacked in recent history is the US Army Psychological Warfare during World War II. They'd take planes of pamphlets and drop the pamphlets over enemy territory. As a citizen, picking one of these up may just be enough to plant the seed of doubt in your mind. Or, if you agreed with the pamphlet, you have an introduction to start finding out if others thought you like, "hey, did you see that pamphlet?" is a fine conversation starter. 50 out of 51 people may tell you it's junk, but meeting that one other person could open the door to a whole set of other people. I thought about this in relation to the Irrespressible.info campaign from Amnesty International and the seesmic comment of the same.
Keep the comments coming, they're great.
And to Abby (spelling?) thanks for sharing everything you've shared. It's fantastic.